Kontestasi Isu Anti-Korupsi: Analisis Framing Robert M. Entman pada Pemberitaan RUU Perampasan Aset di Instagram dan X (Twitter)
Keywords:
framing analysis, Robert M. Entman, Asset Forfeiture, Instagram, X (Twitter)Abstract
This study analyzes and compares how the Asset Forfeiture Bill (RUU Perampasan Aset) was framed on Instagram and X (formerly Twitter) in Indonesia, using Robert M. Entman’s four-element framing model. A descriptive qualitative design was employed. Data were collected through digital documentation of high-engagement public posts selected by purposive sampling, together with visible audience responses and secondary sources, and were coded with an Entman-based matrix. Instagram framed the issue as a shared moral problem: legislative delay by the House of Representatives (DPR) was blamed, state losses and broken promises were condemned, and faster enactment was demanded. X framed the bill itself as a contestable object: its urgency and drafting quality were questioned, the risk of political misuse was emphasized, and remedies ranged from revising articles to reforming law enforcement first. These differences are consistent with platform affordances. Instagram functions mainly as a space for mobilizing moral solidarity, whereas X operates as an arena of dialectic and public scrutiny of policy, although the quality of that scrutiny varies.
References
Aulyzan, D. A., Suparto, D., & Muyassaroh, I. S. (2026). Analisis framing berita pada akun Instagram @narasinewsroom mengenai isu politik di Indonesia. Interaksi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 10(2), 164–183. https://doi.org/10.30596/interaksi.v10i2.30121
Bossetta, M. (2018). The digital architectures of social media: Comparing political campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 U.S. election. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(2), 471–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018763307
Bungin, B. (2011). Penelitian kualitatif: Komunikasi, ekonomi, kebijakan publik, dan ilmu sosial lainnya (Edisi kedua). Kencana.
Databoks Katadata. (2026, 28 Agustus). Isu pembahasan RUU Perampasan Aset di media sosial cenderung negatif. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2026/08/28/isu-pembahasan-ruu-perampasan-aset-di-media-sosial-cenderung-negatif
Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia. (2026, 6 Oktober). RUU Perampasan Aset jadi inisiatif DPR, percepat penyelesaian pembahasannya. https://emedia.dpr.go.id/news/2026/10/06/ruu-perampasan-aset-jadi-inisiatif-dpr-percepat-penyelesaian-pembahasannya
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Eriyanto. (2002). Analisis framing: Konstruksi, ideologi, dan politik media. LKiS.
Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. W. (2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12180
Greenberg, T. S., Samuel, L. M., Grant, W., & Gray, L. (2009). Stolen asset recovery: A good practice guide for non-conviction based asset forfeiture. World Bank.
Highfield, T., & Leaver, T. (2016). Instagrammatics and digital methods: Studying visual social media, from selfies and GIFs to memes and emoji. Communication Research and Practice, 2(1), 47–62.
Hukumonline Newsroom [@hukumonlinenewsroom]. (2025, 3 September). DPR janji RUU Perampasan Aset dibahas usai revisi KUHAP kelar [Reel]. Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOKaqXdk9kc/
iNews.id. (2025, 20 September). ICW: RUU Perampasan Aset bisa tingkatkan pemulihan kerugian negara akibat korupsi. https://www.inews.id/news/nasional/icw-ruu-perampasan-aset-bisa-tingkatkan-pemulihan-kerugian-negara-akibat-korupsi
Infobanknews. (2026, 28 Agustus). RUU Perampasan Aset dikebut, ini 3 kemunduran substansi versi koalisi sipil. https://infobanknews.com/ruu-perampasan-aset-dikebut-ini-3-kemunduran-substansi-versi-koalisi-sipil
Katadata. (2026, 27 Agustus). Janji DPR: RUU Perampasan Aset rampung paling lambat 15 Desember 2026. https://katadata.co.id/berita/nasional/6a8fd63d171bb/janji-dpr-ruu-perampasan-aset-rampung-paling-lambat-15-desember-2026
Leliana, I., Herry, H., Suratriadi, P., & Enrieco, E. (2021). Analisis framing model Robert Entman tentang pemberitaan kasus korupsi bansos Juliari Batubara di Kompas.com dan BBCIndonesia.com. Cakrawala: Jurnal Humaniora, 21(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.31294/jc.v21i1.10042
Meraz, S., & Papacharissi, Z. (2013). Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on #Egypt. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 138–166.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press.
Riyandanu, M. F. (2026, 26 Agustus). Chandra Hamzah: RUU Perampasan Aset bukan obat berantas korupsi. Katadata. https://katadata.co.id/berita/nasional/6a8ef3ec47911/chandra-hamzah-ruu-perampasan-aset-bukan-obat-berantas-korupsi
Rohman, M. F. (2025, 9 September). Menkum pastikan RUU Perampasan Aset masuk Prolegnas prioritas 2025, 17 tahun nasibnya tak jelas. NU Online. https://www.nu.or.id/nasional/menkum-pastikan-ruu-perampasan-aset-masuk-prolegnas-prioritas-2025-17-tahun-nasibnya-tak-jelas-RDtVV
Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sumatera Adil & Federal [@indepenSumatera]. (2026, 3 September). Ketika Rocky Gerung mengatakan ketika RUU Perampasan Aset orang pertama yang harus di rampas asetnya adalah pria solo [Unggahan]. X. https://x.com/indepenSumatera/status/2095394176859095160
